• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Laceration(s) (1946); Tissue Breakdown (2681)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product name: actual ostomy product is unknown.The end user could only provide: ostomy wafer - ref number unknown, 510(k) number: exempt, product code: exe, common device name: protector, ostomy.This emdr is being submitted since bleeding from stoma occurred which required cauterization.It was unknown if end user was cutting wafer beyond the cutting range due to time lapse and limited few details provided.Based on the available information, this event is deemed to be a serious injury.This complaint has been evaluated.No lot number is available.A detailed investigation or batch review cannot be conducted.Therefore, this evaluation will be closed.This issue will be monitored through the post market product monitoring review process.To date no additional information has been received.Should additional information become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Fda registration number reporting site: (b)(4), manufacturing site: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The consumer reported that she experienced bleeding with one company¿s cut-to-fit (ctf) durahesive (dh) wafer with 1 3/4" flange, which cut into her stoma near the base approximately three years ago from an unknown number of durahesive ctf wafers out of unknown number of boxes with an unknown lot number.She experienced lot of bleeding, but denied the bleeding filled the pouch.She felt that the wafer barrier wore off and the flange ring was the problem.She stated that she went to a wound center where it was cauterized and followed up every two to three weeks for a few months.She did not remember if the area was cauterized after the initial visit.She further reported that she was told by the wound center to avoid 1 ¾¿ inch flanges.She experienced minor bleeding with appliance changes subsequently at intervals shortly after that, but it would resolve independently.She would remove the wafer and apply a new one until changed to larger wafer.No further concerns were reported since that time.She denied use of blood thinners.She denied any leakage under the wafer or skin irritation.She completed a tele-health visit which was in november 2022 but did not report this issue at that time.Other product use included seal and ostomy paste.She trialed one tele-health recommended company¿s wafer without incident.Due to time lapse, only a few details were provided.No photo available is available at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Manufacturer (Section D)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal 91000
DR  91000
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal 91000
DR   91000
Manufacturer Contact
pamela meadows
7815 national service road
suite 600
greensboro, NC 
3365424679
MDR Report Key16047282
MDR Text Key306159282
Report Number9618003-2022-05416
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/26/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age67
Patient SexFemale
-
-