Based on the investigation analysis, the reported event was due to a temporary mismatch, which was probably due to the insertion site still healing at the time.The reported event was on the 4th day after insertion, when the sensor was likely to be still stabilizing after insertion.Once the sensor stabilized after insertion, the system began performing within expectations, and there was better accuracy between the sensor readings and fingerstick measurements.User didn't seek medical attention and didn't need to self resolve the event as the blood glucose (bg) was in normal range.User was explained about early sensor wear and was recommended to perform timely calibrations ( ref case: complaintrec-(b)(4) ).Per dms, user is currently using the system with up to date information.No further resolution was found necessary for this complaint.D4.Device information updated.H3.Device evaluated by manufacturer?: yes.H4.Device manufacture date updated to 6 january 2022.H6.Investigation findings updated to 114.H6.Investigation conclusions updated to 4315.
|