This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Reporter is a j&j employee.The device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
It was reported by the affiliate in russia that the package of the rigidloop adjustable cortical implant, standard device was not soldered; therefore, the device was not sterile.There was no procedure nor patient involvement reported.No additional information was provided.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, photos were provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the box is open and no anomalies could be observed on the packaging.The photos are not clear to confirm this complaint.Physical evaluation should provide more information to discern a possible root cause.The 100% in production control is performed according to sws-0380 rev:11, visually inspect the pouches according to the associated procedures: pic-vse0028 rev8 and wift0119 rev9, the pouch sealing must be 100% inspected by the operator.An in-process control has been performed on 9 parts chosen randomly by a certified operator and have been inspected also per wi-ft0118rev27, pic-vs121rev4 wi-ft0119 rev 9 and pic-vse0028 rev8.The result of this process check is successful, none of the 9 parts were non-conformed.The potential occurrence of having an incomplete sealing has been evaluated with 3 and the effect of having a packaging not sealed has been evaluated in the wi-6474 rev23 by combining probability and severity levels: this risk is acceptable.Based on the investigation performed and documented as part of this rationale, there is no specific event recorded in the dhr that could have generated quality.However, the most probable assignable cause is a human error made by the operators who did work on the sealing process of 232447 lot 9l47851 - as a result, a nonconformity(nr-0190081) was opened to make the operators involved aware of this.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 9l47851, and no nonconformances were identified.A further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any kind for this lot of 100 devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|