Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced stitch discomfort, separation of perineum 1-2 mm deep, urinary tract infections, slower than normal urinary stream, sensation of urethra, urinary obstruction, pelvic pain, chronic pelvic pain, small midline abdominal adhesion and thigh pain.Patient had explantation of the device via general anesthesia.Pathology report showed synthetic mesh consistent with device.Patient had a vaginal device complication; an ultrasound showed a possible foreign body.Patient had an incision and removal of a foreign body deep in the obturator externus muscle complicated right and left, via general anesthesia.The pathology report showed soft tissue, obturator externus muscles, right thigh, excised mature skeletal muscle and fibrous tissue with atrophy and reactive changes.Patient had robotic-assisted, laparoscopic transabdominal explantation of another manufacturer's soft device from bladder sacrocolpopexy device, posterior colporrhaphy with repair rectocele and perineorrhaphy, perineorrhaphy revision via general anesthesia.
|