Updated fields: d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h10.The mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - investigation of the returned unit showed that the lock had rotational movement and a residue buildup was present.Upon disassembly, it was noted that the index knob and the lock needed new components to replace worn internal parts; unit was machined to have heli-coils added to large starburst threads.New components were added to replace worn internal parts, and general cleaning and maintenance were performed.Root cause - evaluation found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Service & repair could not duplicate slippage.The clamp had minor rotational movement in the locked position, but when properly positioned and put under pressure, the clamp would not have slipped.Probable root cause of the reported complaint is improper or suboptimal positioning of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends were identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
Medwatch report# 4401610000-2023-8001 was received on 25jan2023 with the following information: "during the procedure, the surgeon stated that the mayfield skull clamp slipped.After the procedure was completed, a laceration was noted at the location of one of the mayfield skull clamp pins.The surgeon applied stitches to the laceration.The patient was taken to recovery.No other untoward patient effects.Integra would like to have the device returned for evaluation." what was the original intended procedure? : c-2-c5 posterior cervical decompression and fusion what problem did the user have (check all that apply) :device malfunction - that is, the device did not do what it was supposed to do date of event: (b)(6).Dat of report: 01/2023.
|