• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION OH/USA MAYFIELD MODIFIED SKULL CLAMP; SKULL CLAMPS AND HEADREST SYSTEMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION OH/USA MAYFIELD MODIFIED SKULL CLAMP; SKULL CLAMPS AND HEADREST SYSTEMS Back to Search Results
Model Number A1059
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Slipped (1584)
Patient Problems Laceration(s) (1946); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/15/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts are being made to obtain additional information.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
A facility reported that a surgeon felt that the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) slipped and was not holding properly during a c2-c5 posterior cervical decompression and fusion procedure.There was an unspecified minor delay with no patient injury reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated fields: d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h10.The mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - investigation of the returned unit showed that the lock had rotational movement and a residue buildup was present.Upon disassembly, it was noted that the index knob and the lock needed new components to replace worn internal parts; unit was machined to have heli-coils added to large starburst threads.New components were added to replace worn internal parts, and general cleaning and maintenance were performed.Root cause - evaluation found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Service & repair could not duplicate slippage.The clamp had minor rotational movement in the locked position, but when properly positioned and put under pressure, the clamp would not have slipped.Probable root cause of the reported complaint is improper or suboptimal positioning of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends were identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medwatch report# 4401610000-2023-8001 was received on 25jan2023 with the following information: "during the procedure, the surgeon stated that the mayfield skull clamp slipped.After the procedure was completed, a laceration was noted at the location of one of the mayfield skull clamp pins.The surgeon applied stitches to the laceration.The patient was taken to recovery.No other untoward patient effects.Integra would like to have the device returned for evaluation." what was the original intended procedure? : c-2-c5 posterior cervical decompression and fusion what problem did the user have (check all that apply) :device malfunction - that is, the device did not do what it was supposed to do date of event: (b)(6).Dat of report: 01/2023.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAYFIELD MODIFIED SKULL CLAMP
Type of Device
SKULL CLAMPS AND HEADREST SYSTEMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION OH/USA
4900 charlemar drive
4900 charlemar drive
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION OH/USA
4900 charlemar drive
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
vivian nelson
1100 campus drive
princeton, NJ 
6099362319
MDR Report Key16114306
MDR Text Key308583556
Report Number3004608878-2022-00295
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HBL
UDI-Device Identifier10381780253457
UDI-Public10381780253457
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
PRE-AMEND
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/06/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberA1059
Device Catalogue NumberA1059
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/29/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-