• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD POLYSORB; ENDOSCOPIC TISSUE APPROXIMATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD POLYSORB; ENDOSCOPIC TISSUE APPROXIMATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 170050
Device Problems Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Unintended Radiation Exposure (4565)
Event Date 12/20/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: unknown estitch - unknown endo stitch instrument.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, when closing the vaginal cuff, the needle broke in half.A second device was used and the same issue occurred with the same lot and item number.The component fell into the patient's cavity.The surgical time was extended by 30 minutes or more.A new device was used to resolve the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: e1 (last name).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, when closing the vaginal cuff, the needle broke in half.A second device was used and the same issue occurred with the same lot and item number.Half of the needle fell into the patient's cavity and was not retrieved.The surgical time was extended by 30 minutes or more and an x-ray was performed.A new device was used to resolve the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.Eleven devices, nine sealed with the appropriate packaging and two empty packaging were available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that the needle broke into separate pieces and a component disengaged from the device into the surgical cavity.The reported issues could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLYSORB
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC TISSUE APPROXIMATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR  0101
Manufacturer (Section G)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR   0101
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key16142072
MDR Text Key307151952
Report Number9612501-2023-00088
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCW
UDI-Device Identifier20884521126760
UDI-Public20884521126760
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K934738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number170050
Device Catalogue Number170050
Device Lot NumberJ1J2164Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-