It was reported by the customer via "patient had port placed today and was accessed with huber needle.Later in evening, dressing was noted to be bloody, port was de-accessed by primary rn and bevel of needle found to be bent but intact.Insertion site assessed and some bruising noted, no longer bleeding.Did not appear infiltrated.Re-accessed with new needle, no apparent harm." additional information provided: patient being treated for lymphoma.12/22/2022: the returned sample exhibited a bend that did not allow the safety to successfully engage.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of bent needle was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was a one 22 ga x 0.5 in safestep infusion set.The returned product sample was evaluated and the needle was observed to be bent at the needle tip.The following observations were noted during the sample evaluation: usage residue was seen on the sample which proved that the product had experienced at least some use, the bend in the needle had occurred away from the needle base which can be caused by device manipulation during/following port access, the needle tip was barbed suggesting contact between the needle and port base an attempt to advance the safety over the needle tip was unsuccessful as the safety could not pass the bent region of the needle.Force applied at an angle to the needle axis, or if the needle is not inserted perpendicular into the port septum, can lead to bending of the needle shaft.It is advised to verify that the needle length is correct based on port reservoir depth, tissue thickness and the thickness of any dressing beneath the bend of the needle; if too long, needle and/or port may be damaged at insertion.Additionally, avoid excessive manipulation once the needle is in the port.No potential damage related to the manufacturing process was noted on the complaint sample.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|