SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 20 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71335754 |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/12/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during a thr surgery, the r3 20 deg xlpe acet lnr 36mm x 54mm was found to be deformed while inside the patient.Surgery was resumed with an equivalent product after a 5 min delay.Patient was not harmed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.With the results of this investigation the root cause of this event could not be determined.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include size selected or surgical technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device reveals scratches and deep gouges in the device.A dimensional evaluation performed on the device revealed that the part was evaluated for critical to quality features, but it was noted that the returned part was severely damaged and gouged on the splines and around the locking groove crests.This impacted the outer profile analysis to a degree, however, the returned part passed that inspection on the overlay.All other measured features (internal spherical radius, spline thickness, wall thickness, and outer diameter) are within tolerance per associated drawing print.At this point, the cause of the complaint cannot be contributed to the dimensions of the returned product.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with the inspection drawing, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include surgical technique used and/or insertion technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|