• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. SMOKE EVACUATOR; MEGADYNE¿ SMOKE EVACUATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. SMOKE EVACUATOR; MEGADYNE¿ SMOKE EVACUATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MESE1
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Ventilation Problem in Device Environment (3027)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/01/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during an unknown procedure the flow rate is out of spec.The unit was too sensitive so when the autoactivation function came on when it is not supposed to, and deflated the pneumoperitoneum.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date of event: only event year known: 2023.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Serial number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Additional information received: there were no patient injuries reported this time.They found that the flow rate is out of spec during testing.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/10/2023.Device analysis: unit was inspected prior to testing and found set to level 3 current sensitivity.Flow test and passive activation performed for troubleshooting and tests passed.Passive activation was performed using provided power cord using 240 vac bench power.(b)(4) was not confirmed.An unexpected noise was heard during the investigation and the unit was found to have carbon filter particulate in the system; this makes the unit unrepairable due to risk of biohazard to the service technicians.Particulate was noted on the decontamination and service woa.There was no impact to the flow or activation test as a result of the carbon particulate found.The device history records were reviewed and certed by external manufacturing that the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of the equipment.The certificate records are accessible through external manufacturing.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: 1.Was the mese plugged in with the connect cable, rf sensor, or both? the surgeon was using an olympus thunderbeat energy device at the time.The smoke evac connect cable was not connected to the olympus generator at the time.The rf sensor was also not attached to the thunderbeat either.2.What generator was used? a medtronic ft10 esu was used and connected via connect cable to the smoke evac.3.Was the sensitivity level adjusted? all smoke evacs had their sensitivity setting dropped by one bar as a few were being triggered by the grid power intermittently.4.Did the biomed test the activation using an open circuit or closed circuit? this i do not know and will have to ask did the biomed test the activation using an open circuit or closed circuit? at the time we had the set up with no circuit given the lack of consumables and other pieces.1.Who packed the shipment? was it the customer site or jnj representative? the customer 2.Was the device used in surgery between the (b)(4)? the unit was removed from use when the incident occurred and has never been used since.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/23/2023.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: was the mese plugged in with the connect cable, rf sensor, or both? what generator was used? was the sensitivity level adjusted? did the biomed test the activation using an open circuit or closed circuit?.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMOKE EVACUATOR
Type of Device
MEGADYNE¿ SMOKE EVACUATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH 45242
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
475 calle c
guaynabo 
3035526892
MDR Report Key16283528
MDR Text Key308844107
Report Number1721194-2023-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FYD
UDI-Device Identifier10614559104545
UDI-Public10614559104545
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/02/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberMESE1
Device Catalogue NumberMESE1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-