ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Erosion (1750); Incontinence (1928); Pain (1994); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 12/05/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that any of the ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? which specific ethicon products have been used during the procedures (product code, lot number)? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with any of the ethicon products used in this procedure? if so, please provide details.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Patient demographics? this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Component code: g07002 ¿ device not returned.Clinical code: e2402 ¿ recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00192-022-05442-9.
|
|
Event Description
|
Title: subjective outcomes 12 years after transvaginal mesh versus native tissue repair in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse; a randomized controlled trial the present study describes an extended follow-up study after 12 years and focusses on subjective outcomes of women who underwent surgery for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse in the randomized index study.One hundred and ninety-four (194) women had been randomized in the original study and in the present study, 45 (47%) in the vaginal mesh repair versus 43 (43%) women with conventional vaginal native tissue repair completed the long-term questionnaires.The mesh used was a first-generation non-absorbable mesh kit.All types of conventional vaginal native tissue repairs were allowed, and additional vaginal native tissue repairs were allowed in the mesh group.A non-absorbable prolift ethicon was used.Reported complications included mesh exposure (n=14), recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (n=3) , stress urinary incontinence , obstructive micturition, pain.In conclusion there was no difference in subjective outcome between the groups, but there was a statistically significant higher number of women who had needed further operations.This study confirms that vaginal mesh should not be used in all women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|