A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation (procep) became aware that ten (10) weeks post aquablation procedure the patient is experiencing incontinence (per manufacturer instructions for use, incontinence or overactive bladder is a potential risk of the aquablation procedure).A cystogram procedure was performed on the patient, which revealed that the external sphincter had been injured during the aquablation procedure.As a result, the patient started pelvic floor physical therapy.No malfunction of the aquabeam robotic system was reported during this event.On (b)(6) 2023, procept confirmed that the patient has shown significant improvement with the pelvic floor physical therapy, including improvement with the reported incontinence.
|
The aquabeam robotic system is a reusable device; therefore, it is still currently in possession of the user facility.The investigation of this event consisted of a review of the treatment log files, the device history record (dhr), and labeling.The aquabeam robotic system's treatment logs file was reviewed, which confirmed no malfunctions during the aquablation procedure.The review of the treatment logs indicated that the system functioned as designed.A review of the device history record (dhr) ab2000-b / serial number (b)(6) was conducted, which confirmed that there were no non-conformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The aquabeam robotic system instructions for use (ifu), ifu0101-00, rev.E, was reviewed and states the following: 4.3.Warnings: procedure: as with any surgical urologic procedure, potential perioperative risks of the aquablation procedure include: o bleeding.A root cause for the reported event could not be determined.A cystogram procedure was performed on the patient, which revealed that the external sphincter had been injured during the aquablation procedure.A formal review of the event log files was conducted with the treating surgeon.No malfunction of the aquabeam robotic system was reported during this event.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|