• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8606500
Device Problems Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Analyze Signal (1539); Failure to Deliver (2338)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/18/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The hospital's biomed was seeking dräger's assistance on the phone; the technical support team guided him through the device evaluation procedure to identify the root cause for the ventilator failure.It was noticed that debris on the motor encoder disc had formed.The disc was cleaned; the device has been tested after reassembly and, no further deviation from specification was detected.The unit has been returned to use with no new issues reported to date.The log file was analyzed in follow-up by the manufacturer.The records confirm both the reported event as well as the findings and conclusions made by the biomed in cooperation with dräger's tech support.The device had passed the automatic power-on self-test (post) in the morning of the doe without deviations.The concerned procedure was started at 10:42 pm.The first few minutes in automatic ventilation were unremarkable until the device detected a wrong motor position at 11:00 pm.As designed the unit forced a safety shutdown of automatic ventilation and posted a corresponding alarm.The user restarted the device, skipped the next post instance and used the device for the next 1.5 hours in pressure support mode without further problems.Based on these records a causal connection between the shutdown of ventilation and the debris found on the encoder disc later-on seems plausible.Motor speed and the number of rotations must be monitored continuously as they define the ventilator piston hub and thus, the tidal volume applied to the patient.The motor has an encoder wheel on its axis which has markings that pass by a light barrier during motor rotation.With debris on the encoder disc the position detection may be impaired.To protect the patient from potentially hazardous output the device is designed to shut-down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of an alarm.Manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extend.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as designed upon a certain error condition.The origin of the debris could not be determined, retrospecitvely.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a ventilator failure occurred during a surgical procedure.It was mentioned that this did not lead to consequences for the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APOLLO
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
MDR Report Key16324409
MDR Text Key309130191
Report Number9611500-2023-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K042607
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8606500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/30/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-