|
Model Number PV10 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 11/21/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
According to the implant summary card for sgpv00, sid (b)(6), yes and total were marked for the question "was previously implanted cryolife tissue explanted during this procedure?" based on a search in the implant summary database, this patient had pv10, sid (b)(6) from donor (b)(4) implanted on (b)(6) 2004.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the implant summary card for sgpv00, sid (b)(4), yes and total were marked for the question "was previously implanted cryolife tissue explanted during this procedure?" based on a search in the implant summary database, this patient had pv10, sid (b)(4) from donor (b)(6) implanted on (b)(6) 2004.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were made.No additional information is forthcoming.There is limited information available regarding the event, including but not limited to preoperative diagnoses, past medical history, or the reason for the reported explant 18 years post-operative.No operative notes are available at this time and no explanted tissue was returned for evaluation.Per the implant summary database, this pv10 was implanted on (b)(6) 2004 in a 25-year-old female as a pulmonary valve.Per the implant card received, this valve was explanted on (b)(6) 2022 and a sgpv00 was implanted during the same procedure.There are no additional details available for the time frame between the original implant in 2004 and the procedure performed in 2022.There is insufficient information to determine a root cause for the reported explant.However, it was originally implanted as a pulmonary valve, so an explant occurring 18 years after implant demonstrates the homograft performed within expectations.Adequate precautions are provided in the instructions for use.Risk has been reduced as low as possible and overall residual risk is acceptable.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|