• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GF-UCT180
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Pain (1994); Perforation (2001); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 10/17/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled, "efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter european study" background: endoscopic ultrasound (eus)-guided transmural drainage allows treatment of symptomatic peripancreatic fluid collections (pfcs), with lumen-apposing metal stents (lams) and double pigtail plastic stents (dpps) being the 2 most frequently used modalities.Methods: consecutive patients undergoing pfc drainage in 10 european centers were retrospectively retrieved.Technical success (successful deployment), clinical success (satisfactory drainage), rate and type of early adverse events, drainage duration and complications on stent removal were evaluated.Results: a total of 128 patients¿92 men (71.9%), age 57.2±11.9 years¿underwent drainage, with pancreatic pseudocyst (pc) and walled-off necrosis (won) in 92 (71.9%) and 36 (28.1%) patients, respectively.Lams were used in 80 (62.5%) patients and dpps in 48 (37.5%).Technical success was achieved in 124 (96.9%) of the cases, with no difference regarding either the type of stent (p>0.99) or pfc type (p=0.07).Clinical success was achieved in 119 (93%); pc had a better response than won (91/92 vs.28/36, p<0.001.Conclusions eus-guided drainage of pfcs achieves high percentages of technical and clinical success.Drainage using lams is of shorter duration, but the complication rate is similar between the 2 modalities.Type of adverse events/number of patients.Bleeding - 7 patients.Perforation - 4 patients.Migration - 3 patients.Obstruction/fever - 4 patients.Pain - 1 patient.Other (transient pylorus obstruction) - 1 patient.Stent deployment failure - 4 patients.Complications at removal - 10 patients.This literature article requires 2 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: 1.(b)(6) /gf-uct140-al5.2.(b)(6) /gf-uct180.This medwatch report is for patient identifier: (b)(6).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Although the literature stated "eu-me2 premier plus, evis eus," the complaint was not initiated because no malfunctions were described in the literature for the eu-me2 endoscopic ultrasound center, and no adverse events were associated with it.The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16357659
MDR Text Key309366161
Report Number3002808148-2023-01300
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODG
UDI-Device Identifier04953170341809
UDI-Public04953170341809
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGR
PMA/PMN Number
K093395
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/10/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGF-UCT180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NON-OLYMPUS DEVICE: FG-36UA OR EG-3870UTK
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-