• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. FMC BLOODLINE; SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. FMC BLOODLINE; SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN- FMC BLOODLINE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Itching Sensation (1943); Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s) (4521)
Event Date 01/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.Clinical investigation: based on the available information, there is a temporal and a likely causal relationship between the fresenius combiset tubing and the patient¿s adverse reaction classified by hypotension, itching, cramping, and a sensation of his throat closing.Although rare, hypersensitivity or anaphylactoid reactions to dialysis equipment sterilized with ethylene oxide (eto) are a known risk during hemodialysis.The reactions that occur during hd are the result of an immunoallergic response by the patient after exposure to foreign substances present in the extracorporeal circuit.(lara & martín-malo, 2014) it was later concluded that the patient¿s resumption of his avf access exposed him to additional products sterilized with eto in the needles (not a fresenius product) used for the hd treatments.The use of the needles in conjunction with the combiset tubing triggered a memory immune response in the patient leading to mast cell degranulation and repeated anaphylactic episodes.This was supported by the consistent timing of the episodes immediately after initiation of hemodialysis with gradual worsening in severity.The immediate and positive response to steroid pe-treatment further supported the theory that these events were allergic in nature.There is no evidence of a fresenius combiset tubing product deficiency or malfunction.Additionally, although the patient experienced an adverse reaction during treatment, there is no allegation of a product malfunction or deficiency related to this event.
 
Event Description
On 25/jan/2023, fresenius was made aware of an article, ¿anaphylaxis from ethylene oxide¿sterilized dialysis tubing and needles: a case report.¿ in the article, there is documentation of a 78-year-old male hemodialysis (hd) patient experiencing an adverse event during treatment utilizing the fresenius combiset tubing.The patient has been completing hd for approximately 2.5 years without significant complications.The patient was previously on peritoneal dialysis.The patient had recently been utilizing a tunneled dialysis catheter (tdc) and transitioned back to use of a right upper extremity arteriovenous fistula (avf).This patient was in the hospital being monitored in the intensive care unit (icu) for previous adverse reactions encountered during hemodialysis.On an unknown date, this patient was trialed on a low flow hd treatment.A baxter revaclear dialyzer was utilized in addition to the fresenius combiset.The circuit was primed twice with normal saline.Ten minutes into the hd treatment the patient complained of itching, cramping, and a sensation of his throat closing.The dialysis treatment was stopped after a systolic blood pressure (sbp) drop from 180s to 100s mmhg.No medical intervention was documented within the article.Allergy was then consulted on this patient¿s case.There were concerns for several causes of the patient¿s adverse reaction.However, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (hes), mastocytosis with eosinophilia, and mast cell activation syndrome (mcas) were ruled out.The patient had an elevated serum tryptase at 28 mcg/l (normal <11 mcg/l; concerning for anaphylaxis versus mcas), total ige (>3000 iu/ml), and very high level anti-eto ige antibody >100 ku/l (normal being <0.1 ku/l; concerning for anaphylaxis).Due to the concern for hypersensitivity to a component of the dialysis circuit, the patient was administered cetirizine 10 mg twice daily.The patient¿s next dialysis treatment was pre-treated with prednisone 1 mg/kg (80 mg), famotidine 20 mg and diphenhydramine 50 mg.The patient then tolerated a four-hour hd treatment utilizing the tdc with a revaclear dialyzer and tubing that had been primed and rinsed twice with normal saline.The patient then tolerated subsequent dialysis sessions utilizing the above regimen.Following discharge, the prednisone pre-treatment was tapered to 20 mg prior to dialysis.The patient was evaluated by allergy/immunology and received two doses of omalizumab.The plan was to eventually discontinue steroid pre-treatment.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2023, fresenius was made aware of an article, ¿anaphylaxis from ethylene oxide¿sterilized dialysis tubing and needles: a case report.¿ in the article, there is documentation of a 78-year-old male hemodialysis (hd) patient experiencing an adverse event during treatment utilizing the fresenius combiset tubing.The patient has been completing hd for approximately 2.5 years without significant complications.The patient was previously on peritoneal dialysis.The patient had recently been utilizing a tunneled dialysis catheter (tdc) and transitioned back to use of a right upper extremity arteriovenous fistula (avf).This patient was in the hospital being monitored in the intensive care unit (icu) for previous adverse reactions encountered during hemodialysis.On an unknown date, this patient was trialed on a low flow hd treatment.A baxter revaclear dialyzer was utilized in addition to the fresenius combiset.The circuit was primed twice with normal saline.Ten minutes into the hd treatment the patient complained of itching, cramping, and a sensation of his throat closing.The dialysis treatment was stopped after a systolic blood pressure (sbp) drop from 180s to 100s mmhg.No medical intervention was documented within the article.Allergy was then consulted on this patient¿s case.There were concerns for several causes of the patient¿s adverse reaction.However, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (hes), mastocytosis with eosinophilia, and mast cell activation syndrome (mcas) were ruled out.The patient had an elevated serum tryptase at 28 mcg/l (normal <11 mcg/l; concerning for anaphylaxis versus mcas), total ige (>3000 iu/ml), and very high level anti-eto ige antibody >100 ku/l (normal being <0.1 ku/l; concerning for anaphylaxis).Due to the concern for hypersensitivity to a component of the dialysis circuit, the patient was administered cetirizine 10 mg twice daily.The patient¿s next dialysis treatment was pre-treated with prednisone 1 mg/kg (80 mg), famotidine 20 mg and diphenhydramine 50 mg.The patient then tolerated a four-hour hd treatment utilizing the tdc with a revaclear dialyzer and tubing that had been primed and rinsed twice with normal saline.The patient then tolerated subsequent dialysis sessions utilizing the above regimen.Following discharge, the prednisone pre-treatment was tapered to 20 mg prior to dialysis.The patient was evaluated by allergy/immunology and received two doses of omalizumab.The plan was to eventually discontinue steroid pre-treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer and the lot number was not provided.No shipping search could be performed for the lots delivered to the facility since there is no facility number reported or additional information for the search.Consequently no product will be returned from the distribution center to be analyzed since the lot number is unknown and no information from the facility is available for the identified of the possible involved lots.Since the complaint sample is not available for evaluation neither photos or videos were provided for evaluation and a device history review was not performed since the lot number is unknown and no information was found on the system, the alleged event could not be confirmed.At this time, no sample has been provided.Should the sample become available, the investigation file will be reopened and will be updated accordingly.There is no allegation or objective evidence indicating a fresenius product(s) or device(s) deficiency or malfunction occurred.Based on the information available in the complaint file, a causal relationship between the product and the incident cannot be determined.
 
Event Description
On 25/jan/2023, fresenius was made aware of an article, ¿anaphylaxis from ethylene oxide¿sterilized dialysis tubing and needles: a case report.¿ in the article, there is documentation of a 78-year-old male hemodialysis (hd) patient experiencing an adverse event during treatment utilizing the fresenius combiset tubing.The patient has been completing hd for approximately 2.5 years without significant complications.The patient was previously on peritoneal dialysis.The patient had recently been utilizing a tunneled dialysis catheter (tdc) and transitioned back to use of a right upper extremity arteriovenous fistula (avf).This patient was in the hospital being monitored in the intensive care unit (icu) for previous adverse reactions encountered during hemodialysis.On an unknown date, this patient was trialed on a low flow hd treatment.A baxter revaclear dialyzer was utilized in addition to the fresenius combiset.The circuit was primed twice with normal saline.Ten minutes into the hd treatment the patient complained of itching, cramping, and a sensation of his throat closing.The dialysis treatment was stopped after a systolic blood pressure (sbp) drop from 180s to 100s mmhg.No medical intervention was documented within the article.Allergy was then consulted on this patient¿s case.There were concerns for several causes of the patient¿s adverse reaction.However, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (hes), mastocytosis with eosinophilia, and mast cell activation syndrome (mcas) were ruled out.The patient had an elevated serum tryptase at 28 mcg/l (normal <11 mcg/l; concerning for anaphylaxis versus mcas), total ige (>3000 iu/ml), and very high level anti-eto ige antibody >100 ku/l (normal being <0.1 ku/l; concerning for anaphylaxis).Due to the concern for hypersensitivity to a component of the dialysis circuit, the patient was administered cetirizine 10 mg twice daily.The patient¿s next dialysis treatment was pre-treated with prednisone 1 mg/kg (80 mg), famotidine 20 mg and diphenhydramine 50 mg.The patient then tolerated a four-hour hd treatment utilizing the tdc with a revaclear dialyzer and tubing that had been primed and rinsed twice with normal saline.The patient then tolerated subsequent dialysis sessions utilizing the above regimen.Following discharge, the prednisone pre-treatment was tapered to 20 mg prior to dialysis.The patient was evaluated by allergy/immunology and received two doses of omalizumab.The plan was to eventually discontinue steroid pre-treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer and the lot number was not provided.No shipping search could be performed for the lots delivered to the facility since there is no facility number reported or additional information for the search.Consequently no product will be returned from the distribution center to be analyzed since the lot number is unknown and no information from the facility is available for the identified of the possible involved lots.Since the complaint sample is not available for evaluation neither photos or videos were provided for evaluation and a device history review was not performed since the lot number is unknown and no information was found on the system, the alleged event could not be confirmed.At this time, no sample has been provided.Should the sample become available, the investigation file will be reopened and will be updated accordingly.There is no allegation or objective evidence indicating a fresenius product(s) or device(s) deficiency or malfunction occurred.Based on the information available in the complaint file, a causal relationship between the product and the incident cannot be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FMC BLOODLINE
Type of Device
SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
mike allen #1331
parque industrial reynosa
reynosa 88780
MX  88780
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
director, quality systems
900 w zaragosa drive suite d
pharr TX 78577
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key16359724
MDR Text Key309370935
Report Number0008030665-2023-00146
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FJK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201207
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN- FMC BLOODLINE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Date Manufacturer Received03/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-