Outcomes attributed to adverse event: alleged infection.There was no mainstay medical representative at the time of the explant procedure; therefore, no product was returned for evaluation.However, a review of manufacturing and sterilization records revealed no non-conformances or any indication that the device would have contributed to the alleged infection.Explanted stimulation leads (81xx).D20900817 / d20900818.Mmlreference#: (b)(4).
|
It was reported that the patient who was implanted with the reactiv8 system had an explant due to a suspected post-operative wound infection.The patient had a low-grade temperature of 99.0, drainage from the implantable pulse generator ( ipg) site incision, and the left flank showed mild perincisonal erythema and superficial skin loss about the size of nickel caudal to the midline.Reportedly, the patient admitted picking at the incision site for 5-7 days until he noticed it opened.The patient reported doing well after the explant.The culture result was negative for infection.The patient was treated with antibiotics intravenous at the time of the explant.The device was implanted on (b)(6) 2022 without complications.At the two-week post-op wound check and activation appointment, both incisions were clean, dry, and intact.No erythema was present.
|