|
Model Number 1010R |
Device Problem
Expulsion (2933)
|
Patient Problems
Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Fluid Discharge (2686)
|
Event Date 01/17/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive at this time, and the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Cvrx id#: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that the lead was exposed, and new drainage had been present at the pocket incision for approximately one week.A revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2023.The pocket was not infected and mostly healed.The lead was protruding from the patient, and discharge was present at that location.Both leads were cut above the signs of infection, and the cut lead portions were removed.The wounds were irrigated, and wound vac was applied, and the patient was prescribed oral antibiotics for two weeks.A culture was taken, but results were not shared.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Cvrx id#: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that the lead was exposed, and new drainage had been present at the pocket incision for approximately one week.A revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2023.The pocket was not infected and mostly healed.The lead was protruding from the patient, and discharge was present at that location.Both leads were cut above the signs of infection, and the cut lead portions were removed.The wounds were irrigated, and wound vac was applied, and the patient was prescribed oral antibiotics for two weeks.As of on (b)(6) 2023, the patient was healing well, but the wound vac was still in place.The opinion of the healthcare professional was that the home nurse was applying too much pressure on the gauze as the wound is still deep.The home nurse was subsequently instructed to not apply pressure to the wound and gauze.Prior cultures taken had multiple gram negative and positive methicillin-susceptible staph organisms.On (b)(6) 2023, the wound vac was discontinued, and hydrogel dressings were changed.The next follow-up was scheduled for one month.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Cvrx id# (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that the lead was exposed, and new drainage had been present at the pocket incision for approximately one week.A revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2023.The pocket was not infected and mostly healed.The lead was protruding from the patient, and discharge was present at that location.Both leads were cut above the signs of infection, and the cut lead portions were removed.The wounds were irrigated, and wound vac was applied, and the patient was prescribed oral antibiotics for two weeks.As of (b)(6) 2023, the patient was healing well, but the wound vac was still in place.The opinion of the healthcare professional was that the home nurse was applying too much pressure on the gauze as the wound is still deep.The home nurse was subsequently instructed to not apply pressure to the wound and gauze.Prior cultures taken had multiple gram negative and positive methicillin-susceptible staph organisms.On (b)(6) 2023, the wound vac was discontinued, and hydrogel dressings were changed.As of (b)(6) 2023, the patient's wound was healed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|