• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 625-0T-28D
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/24/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
The following was reported: a surgery to remove and replace the ceramic liner was performed based on the ct data, which appeared to be damaged liner.A hard object was found during the procedure.Can you please investigate whether the alumina ceramic liner is damaged and what the hard object is? reason for revision was due to pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding damage involving a trident liner was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device indicated that the device had scratches/nicks on the metal and ceramic surfaces.Damage is consistent with explantation.No wear was observed on the device.No further surface discrepancies were observed.-clinician review: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " conclusion/assessment: by report a revision surgery was performed based on a ct scan that seemed to indicate bearing fracture.As noted in the narrative, the ct image appeared to show debris or fragments of some kind in the joint.The radiographic density of the fragments seem more than the head.The origin of the debris, if present, is unclear.No conclusions may be drawn from the x-rays or report without additional medical information.Event confirmation: the event cannot be confirmed without additional medical information.Root cause: a root cause cannot be ascertained without additional medical information." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock on with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised.Visual inspection of the returned device indicated that the device had scratches/nicks on the metal and ceramic surfaces.Damage is consistent with explantation.No wear was observed on the device.No further surface discrepancies were observed.A review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " conclusion/assessment: by report a revision surgery was performed based on a ct scan that seemed to indicate bearing fracture.As noted in the narrative, the ct image appeared to show debris or fragments of some kind in the joint.The radiographic density of the fragments seem more than the head.The origin of the debris, if present, is unclear.No conclusions may be drawn from the x-rays or report without additional medical information.Event confirmation: the event cannot be confirmed without additional medical information.Root cause: a root cause cannot be ascertained without additional medical information." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
The following was reported: a surgery to remove and replace the ceramic liner was performed based on the ct data, which appeared to be damaged liner.A hard object was found during the procedure.Can you please investigate whether the alumina ceramic liner is damaged and what the hard object is? reason for revision was due to pain.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key16383676
MDR Text Key309635265
Report Number0002249697-2023-00163
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRA
UDI-Device Identifier04546540516831
UDI-Public04546540516831
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P000013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/15/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2017
Device Model Number625-0T-28D
Device Catalogue Number625-0T-28D
Device Lot Number42254903
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-