• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ ADVANTAGE IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ ADVANTAGE IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CI-1500-01
Device Problems Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Electro-Static Discharge (2149); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 06/12/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Event Description
The recipient is reportedly experiencing pain when using the device.External equipment was exchanged and programming adjustments were made, however the issue did not resolve.Device testing revealed abnormal results.The recipient ceased device use.Revision surgery will be scheduled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed cuts in the silicone overmold on the top and bottom covers, as well as a severed electrode.This is believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The device passed photographic imaging inspection.System lock was verified.The electrode condition prevented an electrical test from being performed.The device passed some of the electrical tests performed.The device passed the mechanical tests performed.The failure of this device is attributed to a short from a power node to the case ground at the analog chip.It is believed that electrostatic discharge (esd) led to an overload voltage, damaging structures on case ground node inside the analog integrated circuit.This ultimately caused the device to cease functioning.A corrective action was implemented.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record was completed and no anomalies were noted.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was reimplanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIRES 90K¿ ADVANTAGE IMPLANT
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
lacey o'linn
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key16420569
MDR Text Key310051330
Report Number3006556115-2023-00343
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier07630016815805
UDI-Public(01)07630016815805(11)190418(17)210131
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P960058
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/22/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/19/2019
Device Model NumberCI-1500-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age6 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-