• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number G04894
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 02/08/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported, during an endovascular aneurysm repair (evar) procedure, a royal flush plus flush catheter's peel-away straightener was left in the patient.After advancement over an unspecified 0.035-inch wire guide, the catheter's peel away straightener was pulled back but was not removed from the catheter.Resistance was not encountered with manipulation or advancement of the catheter during the procedure, during which six-to-nine-french sheaths were used.Per the physician, the peel-away straightener was left on the catheter and used "again and again" for reinsertion of the same catheter during the "complex, long" procedure.Reportedly, the post-operative course was uneventful; however, the patient was readmitted through the emergency department six days after the evar procedure with groin and lower abdominal pain.A computed tomography angiography (cta) scan revealed a foreign body in the left femoral artery.The peel-away straightener was then removed from the patient during a surgical procedure.Per the physician, it is believed that the peel-away straightener "slipped in" through the arterial sheath during the evar procedure and remained within the artery after the catheter was removed.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter name and address= (b)(6).Initial reporter occupation = distributor.Pma/510(k) number =pre-amendment.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during an endovascular aneurysm repair (evar) procedure, a royal flush plus flush catheter's peel-away straightener was left in the patient.After advancement over an unspecified 0.035-inch wire guide, the catheter's peel away straightener was pulled back but was not removed from the catheter.Resistance was not encountered with manipulation or advancement of the catheter during the procedure, during which six-to-nine-french sheaths were used.Per the physician, the peel-away straightener was left on the catheter and used "again and again" for reinsertion of the same catheter during the "complex, long" procedure.Reportedly, the post-operative course was uneventful; however, the patient was readmitted through the emergency department six days after the evar procedure with groin and lower abdominal pain.A computed tomography angiography (cta) scan revealed a foreign body in the left femoral artery.The peel-away straightener was then removed from the patient during a surgical procedure.Per the physician, it is believed that the peel-away straightener "slipped in" through the arterial sheath during the evar procedure and remained within the artery after the catheter was removed.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No lot-related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states "after initial advancement of the catheter over the wire guide, pull back and peel away the straightener for catheter introduction" and ¿peel-away straightener must not be used as a vascular introducer sheath¿.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and ifu suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that failure to follow instructions contributed to this event.The ifu instructs the user to pull back and peel away the straightener for catheter introduction, and states that the pull away straightener must not be used as a vascular introducer sheath.The physician in this case reported that the peel-away straightener was left on the catheter and used "again and again" for reinsertion of the same catheter during the procedure.The risk analysis was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROYAL FLUSH PLUS FLUSH CATHETER
Type of Device
DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC.
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key16456970
MDR Text Key310407253
Report Number1820334-2023-00196
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier00827002048942
UDI-Public(01)00827002048942(17)250930(10)14984971
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG04894
Device Catalogue NumberHN5.0-38-100-P-10S-PIG
Device Lot Number14984971
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
0.035" AMPLATZ SUPER STIFF WIRE; 0.035" BENTSON WIRE; 0.035" LUNDERQUIST WIRE
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-