Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
According to the available information, this case concerns a 23-year-old male who has been using peristeen transanal irrigation for an unknown period and for an unknown condition.The following information is available by communication with the father of the user: on (b)(6) 2023, the father inserted the peristeen plus catheter (regular size) into the anal canal of the user.The catheter was not connected to the tube and the catheter was inserted too far in the rectum and could not be retrieved.The father was advised to seek medical attention and went to the emergency unit with the son in the afternoon on the same day.The catheter was removed under anesthesia without any problems (presumable endoscopy).The user was not admitted nor prescribed any medication.It was reported that the catheter had travelled 80 cm up in the colon near the location of the spleen.No additional harms were reported.
|