B2: outcomes attributed to adverse event.Section h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, the patient had a total knee arthroplasty in 2007 and had a revision with poly insert exchange on (b)(6) 2023 due to laxity.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It was noted within the attachments that further information is not available.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file and prior actions review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal motion over time, bone degeneration and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|