• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG II; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG II; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG II
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (1696); Pulmonary Edema (2020); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
Event Date 02/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The article, "chief complaint: paroxysmal respiratory distress caused by light exertion" was reviewed.This research article is a single center experience to evaluate paroxysmal respiratory distress caused by light exertion.The patient suffered from combined valvular disease and underwent double valve replacement in which 2 non-abbott valves were implanted.On an unknown date, two 8mm amplatzer vascular plug ii were implanted due to paravalvular leak (pvl).The pvl was almost resolved and the patient reported improved conditions.After an unspecified amount of time, respiratory distress with light exertion and acute pulmonary edema developed again.The symptoms were temporarily improved with diuretic control, however respiratory distress deteriorated further.Uncompensated heart failure caused by mitral valve insufficiency was diagnosed.It was diagnosed that the leaflet had inadequate opening due to interference by the implanted plug, which was protruding into the left ventricular outflow tract.Cardiac computed tomography (ct) was negative for thrormbus, pannus, and vegetation.Redo mitral valve procedure was recommended, however the patient did not consent and was transferred to another facility for conservative cares.[the author of this article is akira fujii, md, hoshinookashinzo kekkan clinic, 1 chome-5-5 higashiishii, matsuyama, ehime 790-0932, japan].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported in a research article uncompensated heart failure caused by mitral valve insufficiency was diagnosed.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG II
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG# 2135147
5050 nathan ln n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key16564291
MDR Text Key311491912
Report Number2135147-2023-01232
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K071699
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/17/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG II
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-