The reported issue is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.A potential root cause for this failure could be due to "materials of construction are not biocompatible or inadequate biological evaluation".It was unknown whether the device had met specifications.The product was used for treatment but it was unknown whether the product had caused the reported failure.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "contraindications ¿ do not use for more than 29 consecutive days.The uninterrupted use for this device, including immediate replacement with the same or an identical device, is intended to be 29 days or less.¿ do not use on patients known to be sensitive to or allergic to any components within the system.¿ do not use on patients who had lower large bowel or rectal surgery within the last year.¿ do not use on patients with any rectal or anal injury, severe rectal or anal stricture or stenosis (or on any patient if the distal rectum cannot accommodate the inflated cuff), confirmed rectal.Or anal tumor, severe hemorrhoids, or fecal impaction.¿ do not use on patients with suspected or confirmed rectal mucosa impairment, i.E.Severe proctitis, ischemic proctitis, mucosal ulcerations.¿ do not use on patients with indwelling rectal or anal device (e.G.Thermometer) or delivery mechanism (e.G.Suppositories) or enemas in place." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|