• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORNIER S.A.S. PERFORM HUMERAL STEM SZ 2 PLUS LONG; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER + ADDITIVE, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORNIER S.A.S. PERFORM HUMERAL STEM SZ 2 PLUS LONG; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER + ADDITIVE, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number DWX2PL
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Subluxation (4525)
Event Date 02/23/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.The device has been discarded by the facility.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient had a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Patient was having some subsidence of the stem at their 1.5 week follow-up visit.Patient fell at 4 weeks post-op, pushing the stem down further and causing a fracture of the tuberosities.The problem appeared to be with an undersized implant.This caused some asymptomatic subsidence post-operatively.The patient fell at 4 weeks post-operatively.It is unknown if the size of the humeral stem had any impact on the fracture caused by the fall.The stem was removed and a 3+ long was cemented in the patient.As far as i know, yes.The fall complicated matters.The implant was initially used for a standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty.The fracture occurred approximately 4 weeks after the primary surgery.This fracture would be considered an a1.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient had a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Patient was having some subsidence of the stem at their 1.5 week follow-up visit.Patient fell at 4 weeks post-op, pushing the stem down further and causing a fracture of the tuberosities.The problem appeared to be with an undersized implant.This caused some asymptomatic subsidence post-operatively.The patient fell at 4 weeks post-operatively.It is unknown if the size of the humeral stem had any impact on the fracture caused by the fall.The stem was removed and a 3+ long was cemented in the patient.As far as i know, yes.The fall complicated matters.The implant was initially used for a standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty.The fracture occurred approximately 4 weeks after the primary surgery.This fracture would be considered an a1.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note the corrections made to the clinical signs code and the health impact code: the reported event was confirmed since x-rays were provided for evaluation.A review of the x-rays by the medical expert confirms ¿marked subsidence¿ of the implant prothesis in the humerus ¿over about 0.5 inches (estimated from the size of the base plate, and assuming it was placed flush with the humeral cut initially).¿ the opinion of the medical expert was requested and stated as following: ¿the stem is probably undersized.In combination with the low placement of the lateralized baseplate and an a-centric glenosphere providing more distalization, these factors play most likely a role in the event.Therefore, i conclude this event happened because a combination of two factors: a user-related (undersizing of the implant) and a patient-related factor (bone quality, and later a traumatic event causing a periprosthetic fracture and the clinical need for revision).¿ a device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned, and only x-rays were provided for the investigation.A review of the labeling and the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.More information as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine if the root cause of the alleged failure is user-related (use of undersized components and low placement of the baseplate), patient-related (poor bone quality and subsequently falling on the implant side) or a combination of factors.If any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFORM HUMERAL STEM SZ 2 PLUS LONG
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER + ADDITIVE, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORNIER S.A.S.
161 rue lavoisier
montbonnot saint-martin 38330
FR  38330
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL CORK (TORNIER ORTHOPEDICS IRELAND LTD)
harnetts cross
macroom, co. cork NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16597569
MDR Text Key311832145
Report Number3000931034-2023-00069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PAO
UDI-Device Identifier00846832085415
UDI-Public00846832085415
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201315
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/19/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberDWX2PL
Device Catalogue NumberDWX2PL
Device Lot NumberAE9767007
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-