A barostim system was implanted on (b)(6) 2023.Two weeks after implant, a follow-up occurred, and the stitches looked good, but the area around the pocket incision was inflamed.The patient was started on oral antibiotics.The patient returned two weeks later for "stitches" removal, and the pocket incision was still inflamed.The patient was prescribed over the counter cream and instructed to finish their course of antibiotics and return in two weeks for wound cleaning.On (b)(6) 2023, the pocket was opened, and the area was cleaned using cautery and saline solution.A portion of tissue was removed with the cautery.The physician stated that the area removed was probably ischemic as a portion of skin may have been higher on one side when doing the stitches, causing an ischemic event.The removed tissue was not sent for culture.No puss-like fluid was observed.Additional oral antibiotics were prescribed.At follow-up appointment on (b)(6) 2023, the infection had cleared, stitches were removed, and the patient was doing well.
|
While analysis was unable to be performed as the device was not returned, per the opinion of the physician, the root cause of the event was possibly related to stitches being higher on one side of the suture.The device history and sterilization record for this device serial number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Cvrx id# (b)(4).
|