• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SPINAL KINETICS M6-C; ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SPINAL KINETICS M6-C; ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC Back to Search Results
Model Number 6LL
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested.A review of the build lot history records 8683 for cdl-637l s/n (b)(4).Iwere exaqmined including the final inspection records and the in-process measurements.There were no relevant ncmrs associated with these lots.The devices met the m6-c product specifications including the axial stiffness and flexural resistance specirfications.Risk management files were reviewed and no new risks were identified.
 
Event Description
Information provided states that patient had m6-cs implanted at c4/5, c5/6 and c6/7 at an unknown time.No "additional" information has been provided regarding reason for explanting of the three devices.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested.A review of the build lot history records 8683 for cdl-637l s/n (b)(6) were examined including the final inspection records and the in-process measurements.There were no relevant ncmrs associated with these lots.The devices met the m6-c product specifications including the axial stiffness and flexural resistance specifications.Risk management files were reviewed and no new risks were identified.Based on the inspection of the retrieved m6-cs, in the absence of additional clinical data, radiographs, or radiographic analysis, the cause of this event was unclear.It is unknown if infection was suspected or confirmed.While some in vivo damage was noted on the cores, the majority of the damage appeared to be extraction damage.Due to the extent of the extraction damage and lack of additional clinical or radiographic information, it is unclear if the devices at c4/5 and c5/6 had failed mechanically at the time of removal.The device at c6/7 was grossly intact, indicating this device had likely not failed at the time of removal.The failure of this procedure and the removal of these devices was not clear.
 
Event Description
Information provided states that patient had m6-cs implanted at c4/5, c5/6 and c6/7 at an unknown time.On (b)(6) 2023 three m6-cs were removed due to unresolved pain.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
M6-C
Type of Device
ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SPINAL KINETICS
501 mercury drive
sunnyvale CA 94085
Manufacturer (Section G)
SPINAL KINETICS
501 mercury drive
sunnyvale CA 94085
Manufacturer Contact
ehab esmail
501 mercury drive
sunnyvale, CA 94085
MDR Report Key16616616
MDR Text Key312010678
Report Number3004987282-2023-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
UDI-Device Identifier00812388030049
UDI-Public00812388030049
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSF
PMA/PMN Number
P170036
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/31/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2022
Device Model Number6LL
Device Catalogue NumberCDL-637L
Device Lot Number8683
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/13/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-