• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR SWAN-GANZ CCOMBO V CCO/SVO2/CEDV THERMODILUTION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR SWAN-GANZ CCOMBO V CCO/SVO2/CEDV THERMODILUTION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 774F75
Device Problems Incorrect Measurement (1383); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product is expected to be returned for analysis but has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.Without the return of the product, it is not possible to determine if damages or defects exist on the product, nor can any manufacturing nonconformance, failure mode, root cause, or potential contributing factors be identified.No actions will be taken at this time.A device history record review has been initiated to document that the device met all specifications upon distribution.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Event Description
It was reported that inaccurate svo2 values and continuous cardiac output measurement issues were observed during use of 774f75 swan-ganz catheter.The displayed svo2 value on a hemosphere was approximately 20 percent lower than the customer expected.The patient was not treated on the incorrect value since the value was considered unreliable.No error message regarding inaccurate svo2 value was observed.Svo2 value from the blood sample was 50 percent and in vivo calibration was performed with this value.However, after the calibration was performed, the indicated svo2 was 30 percent.The physician thought it was unreasonable that the values varied from by 20 percent in such a short period of time.There was no large time gap between blood sampling and calibration.The patient had a medical history of myocardial infarction and was suspected to have dilated cardiomyopathy, however, there was no factor that the value dropped from 50 percent to 30 percent.The catheter was not replaced.The hemosphere monitor was replaced with a vigilance ii monitor and the cable was replaced but the issue persisted, therefore, the malfunction of the catheter was suspected.As for cco measurement issue, the error message of check thermistor was observed on the hemosphere monitor and cco could not be measured.The 70cc2 cable was replaced, but the issue persisted.The displayed rectal temperature was 37 degrees celsius.The catheter has not been replaced since it is used to monitor the pulmonary artery pressure without cco or svo2 values.There were no patient complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our product evaluation lab received 774f75 catheter with attached monoject 1.5 cc limited volume syringe, 1 pressure tubing set, 1 three-way stopcock and non-ew contamination shield which located 46.5 cm to 108 cm proximal from the tip.No package or cal-cup was returned with the catheter.Hemosphere monitor showed error message check thermistor connection when connecting the monitor to returned catheter.Both thermistor and thermal filament connectors were opened with no visible inconsistencies.Resistance value of thermal filament circuit was measured 40.10 ohms, which was in specification.No visible inconsistence was observed on eeprom data.The catheter passed in-vitro calibration on hemosphere monitor.The balloon inflated clear and concentric and remained inflated for 5 minutes without leakage.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.Distal thermal filament cover bonding site was torn.The torn edges matched up.No other visible damage was observed from catheter body, balloon, and returned syringe.The customer report of cco measurement issue was confirmed.Customer report of svo2 measurement issue was unable to confirmed.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.A supplemental report will be submitted if there are any findings.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SWAN-GANZ CCOMBO V CCO/SVO2/CEDV THERMODILUTION CATHETER
Type of Device
SWAN-GANZ CCOMBO V
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan diaz
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492507258
MDR Report Key16637468
MDR Text Key312361247
Report Number2015691-2023-11942
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103146998
UDI-Public(01)00690103146998(17)240921(11)220922(10)64598505
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K040287
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/29/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number774F75
Device Catalogue Number774F75
Device Lot Number64598505
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/23/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/22/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-