Catalog Number 1011528-18 |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/07/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the renal artery with heavy calcification , mild tortuosity and 90% stenosis.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 3.5x12mm non-abbott balloon.The 5.0x18mm herculink elite stent delivery system (sds) was attempt to be advanced but failed to cross due the lesion.The stent became dislodged, but remained together with the sds and was removed as a single unit.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported stent dislodgement was confirmed.The reported failure to advance could not be evaluated as the exact accessory devices and anatomical conditions encountered by the device used during the procedure could not be replicated in the test laboratory.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents.The reported difficulties appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the renal artery with heavy calcification , mild tortuosity and 90% stenosis.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 3.5x12mm non-abbott balloon.The 5.0x18mm herculink elite stent delivery system (sds) was attempt to be advanced but failed to cross due the lesion.The stent became dislodged, but remained together with the sds and was removed as a single unit.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|