• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIACASSIST INC. PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIACASSIST INC. PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Endocarditis (1834)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Livanova manufactures the protekduo cannula.It is unknown where the reported event occurred.The involved patient reportedly suffered from severe covid-19 pneumonia, which can lead to other medical complications.There was no specific malfunction of the protekduo cannula described in the literature in relation to the reported adverse event.If any additional information relevant to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Device unknown.
 
Event Description
Through a literature review (morton, heindl - 2023), livanova became aware of an adverse event which occurred on a patient utilizing a protekduo device.The literature described a 48-year-old female patient suffering from severe covid-19 pneumonia who developed a nosocomial bloodstream infection and tricuspid valve endocarditis following prolonged vv-ecmo support.The patient was on support for 120 days.The literature indicated that the infection and endocarditis were likely a result of the prolonged placement of the intravascular vv-ecmo cannula and intracardiac protekduo device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1.Hospital information provided: (b)(6).H10.Livanova has made multiple attempts to gather more information from the authors of the article.Three of the authors involved were eventually able to be reached (dr.Kara morton, dr.Stephen clarkson, dr.Mustafa ahmed.).Dr.Clarkson stated that the information requested is not available, as these were historic cases.However, he did state that these episodes were likely a result of prolonged hospitalization and prolonged indwelling catheters in a high risk patient and not as a result of a specific device-related malfunction.Given the significant illness these patients faced, dr.Clarkson indicated that these cases highlight concerns for prolonged critical illness and prolonged indwelling catheters in general and not any specific malfunction of the device itself.The device was not made available for investigation at livanova.As an investigation could not be performed, an exact root cause could not be determined and no specific corrective actions were identified.However, given the critical illness of the patient and the commentary provided by the customer, the adverse event was most likely a result of the patient condition and not directly related to a device malfunction.A dhr review could not be performed, as no lot number was made available.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIACASSIST INC.
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh PA 15238
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIACASSIST INC.
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh PA 15238
Manufacturer Contact
ryan coyle
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh, PA 15238
MDR Report Key16667835
MDR Text Key312586840
Report Number2531527-2023-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160257
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/03/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-