SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TRIGEN LOW PROFILE SCREW 5.0MM X 65MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71645065 |
Device Problem
Difficult to Insert (1316)
|
Patient Problem
Rupture (2208)
|
Event Date 03/10/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, a trigen low profile screw 5.0mm x 65mm became hard to turn just before the screw hole.Then a noise was heard, and the screw could not be inserted.So, it was removed and drilling was performed again, but the same issue occurred.After this, the surgeon gave up screw insertion; and the procedure was finished with a five minute delay, without a back up.It was confirmed that all the instruments had been aligning correctly in order to insert the original screw into the intended position.An additional screw was placed at another position to compensate for this issue.Patient's current health status is unknown, but it was reported that bone quality was normal.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
B5: event description.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, a trigen low profile screw 5.0mm x 65mm became hard to turn just before the screw hole.Then a noise was heard, and the screw could not be inserted.So, it was removed and drilling was performed again, but the same issue occurred.After this, the surgeon gave up screw insertion; and the procedure was finished with a five minute delay, without a back up.It was confirmed that all the instruments had been aligning correctly in order to insert the original screw into the intended position.Patient's current health status is unknown, but it was reported that bone quality was normal.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the nail was not returned but the screw was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection of the screw does not reveal any defects.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, the surgeon was unable to insert a trigen low profile screw during an internal fixation procedure.Based on the information provided, the procedure was completed with a 5 minute delay without a back-up device.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient's current condition is unknown and the patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part numbers over the past 12 months and for the batch numbers based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system revealed that a correct surgical technique is essential to a successful outcome.Proper reduction of fractures and proper placement of implants are necessary to effectively treat patients using metallic surgical implants.Also, a proper type and size of implant must be selected to insure effective treatment of patients, this has been identified as preoperative planning.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According to the drawing print, the device size should be 5.0mm x 65mm.Besides, according to the inspection drawing of the screw, final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print and parts are free of burrs or sharp edges.According to work instructions of the nail, the holes should be verified.A review made by the quality engineering team revealed that upon inspection of the defective part, it was discovered that the hex size was found to be undersized.To investigate further, a thorough review of the manufacturing records was conducted, which did not indicate any manufacturing issues or anomalies related to this specific batch.At this time, we do have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet specifications at the time of manufacture.The root cause of this event was determined to be manufacturing process errors such as: off-set error, set-up pc and wear or broken tool.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|