• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 APHERESIS PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 APHERESIS PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number A710962
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/07/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 02/2024).Device pending return.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during port placement procedure, the airguard valved introducer was allegedly cracked and silicone valve was allegedly broke while unscrewing the inner stylet to place the catheter though the peel away sheath.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during port placement procedure, the airguard valved introducer was allegedly cracked and silicone valve was allegedly broke while unscrewing the inner stylet to place the catheter though the peel away sheath.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one fully peeled 10.0f introducer peel-apart sheath was received for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed.A bend and deformation was noted to the sample.The valve cap was noted to be missing from one of the half peel-apart sheath shafts and returned.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fracture issue.The investigation is confirmed for the identified loss of or failure to bond and deformation due to compressive stress issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2024).H11: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one fully peeled 10.0f introducer peel-apart sheath was received for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed.The valve cap was noted to be missing from one of the half peel-apart sheath shafts and returned.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fracture issue.However, the investigation is confirmed for the identified material separation issue as the valve cap was detached and missing.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2024).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during port placement procedure, the airguard valved introducer was allegedly cracked and silicone valve was allegedly broke while unscrewing the inner stylet to place the catheter though the peel away sheath.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APHERESIS PORT
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key16671864
MDR Text Key312598135
Report Number3006260740-2023-01139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PTD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741129438
UDI-Public(01)00801741129438
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K163001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberA710962
Device Catalogue NumberA710962
Device Lot NumberREHP0011
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age29 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-