The build lhr for fg 0005-05, (b)(6), 1684675 was examined including the final inspection records and the in-process measurements.The device met the m6-c product specification including the axial stiffness and flexural resistance specifications.No alleged device failure or malfunction and was only removed due to facet arthropathy.The risk management files were reviewed and no new risks were identified.
|
The build lhr for fg 0005-05 (b)(6) 1684675 was examined including the final inspection records and the in-process measurements.The device met the m6-c product specification including the axial stiffness and flexural resistance specifications.No alleged device failure or malfunction and was only removed due to facet arthropathy.The risk management files were reviewed and no new risks were identified.Based on the inspection of the retrieved m6-c, in conjunction with the clinical data, and the provided radiographic images, the device had not failed mechanically at the time of removal.The device was likely intact, as reported, with little to no in vivo damage visible to the sheath, fiber, and endplates.The core was not returned for inspection.Only one pre-revision image was available, which appeared to confirm that the device was still functional at the time of removal.The provided information appears to indicate that the device was likely contraindicated for the patient and the failure of this procedure was unrelated to device performance.
|