Model Number PVS23 |
Device Problems
Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 03/17/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed that on (b)(6) 2023, a perceval sutureless aortic heart valve size 23 was attempted to be implanted.Reportedly, a pvl was noted after the de-clamping.It was also suspected that inflow ring was partially dislodged from the valve.This perceval valve was explanted and a new pvs23 was implanted instead.Reportedly, the surgery was completed without problem.There was no impact on the patient and patient was stable through the delay in the surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Discarded by the site.
|
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed that on (b)(6) 2023, a perceval sutureless aortic heart valve, pvs23 was attempted to be implanted.Reportedly, a pvl was noted after the de-clamping.It was also suspected that inflow ring was partially dislodged from the valve.This perceval valve was explanted and a new pvs23 was implanted instead.Reportedly, the surgery was completed without problem.There was no impact on the patient and patient was stable through the delay in the surgery.Based on the medical judgement received, this event was not related to the valve.Reportedly, enough calcification was not removed from the annulus at the time of implant and the part of the annulus was protruded and inflow ring was popped out.The manufacturer was informed that no further information will be provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve and stent, model#: icv1209, s/n#: (b)(6), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model#: icv1209) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the medical judgement received, this event was not related to the valve.Reportedly, enough calcification was not removed from the annulus at the time of implant and the part of the annulus was protruded and inflow ring was popped out.Furthermore, from the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were noted.As such, unintended use error caused or contributed to the reported regurgitation event.Should further information be received in the future, a follow up report will be provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|