(b)(6) 2022, a cardiologist put me on a 14 day bardy diagnostics cam heart monitor.Two days after wearing the monitor i experienced inappropriate sinus tachycardia (ist) with a resting heart rate of 141 beats per minute (bpm) that lasted for about 3 hours until i removed the monitor.My heart rate was monitored with a kardia mobile ekg, an omron blood pressure monitor and an oxygen/pulse rate monitor.My exercising heart rate has never been more than 110 bpm.I was not having any physical symptoms so i decided to try to determine the cause of the tachycardia instead of going to the emergency room.What i found is that with some people a heart monitor that uses 5g bluetooth communications, which operates at 2.4 ghz, can cause the heart's sinus node to lock on to a harmonic frequency of the 5g signal and produce a heart rate of between 140 to 150 bpm.With the data from my verification devices, i have proof of this happening to me and i informed bardy diagnostics of this event.Bardy diagnostics response to me was that the monitor that i was using did not utilize 5g bluetooth technology.However, their patent specifies that it contains both bluetooth and wi-fi capability, although it may not have been activated.I checked the cam monitor in a faraday cage and verified that it was not transmitting a bluetooth signal as bardy had said.This raised the question of why i experienced inappropriate sinus tachycardia while wearing their monitor.Somehow it had to be associated with the 5g bluetooth frequency of 2.4 ghz which can cause a pulse rate at a 5g harmonic frequency.The only explanation that i can determine, in my case, is that the length of the sensor wires on the bardy cam monitor is very close to a full wavelength for a 2.4 ghz rf signal, making it an excellent antenna that will pick up and amplify any 2.4 ghz signal in the area.I think this is what happened to me.While i was having the ist, i measured the amount of rf radiation that my body was receiving.The amount of rf radiation in the area was 4.5 mw/m2.When i put the meter close to the cam monitor it went to 171 mw/m2.Anything over 10 mw/m2 is considered dangerous.I am an 84 year old retired electronics engineer, in good health and have not experienced any ill effects from my experience, but long term i have no way of knowing.Depending on your findings and to hopefully prevent someone in poor health from having a bad experience, i would like to request that the fda inform the medical profession of the possibility that patients could have inappropriate sinus tachycardia (ist) when using the cam device.That alone would be a great service to humanity.
|