• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC BENCHMARK ULTRA; SLIDE STAINER, AUTOMATED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC BENCHMARK ULTRA; SLIDE STAINER, AUTOMATED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 05342716001
Device Problems Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Program or Algorithm Execution Failure (4036)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer from germany alleged a staining issue for one patient using the benchmark ultra instrument.The customer alleged the instrument ran a different protocol than the one given on the barcode label.An error message was received from the software.A new slide from the same patient was rerun and generated the same issue.The issue was caught by lab personnel and there was no patient impact.No harm is alleged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental mdr will be filed upon completion of the investigation.E1 facility name truncated due to character limit: (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The initial report stated: "a new slide from the same patient was rerun and generated the same issue." clarification was received and this should say: "the customer prepared a new slide with the same patient tissue and the slide stained normally." section h3, "device evaluation by manufacturer?" was updated.The device code was updated.The investigation showed that there were two runs executed on the same day, approximately 4 hours apart on the same slide position.Both runs had the same barcode label.The first slide run on position #29 ran to completion.Afterward, the same barcode was recycled/reused by the system.Evidence indicated that the user closed drawer #29 with the first slide in it.Next, the user created a subsequent order for which the software used the same barcode.As the first run (stained slide) remained in the drawer (position #29), the roche system read the barcode on the slide¿s label and then started running the newly associated protocol (same slide is processed twice).The issue will be addressed in the upcoming software update.There are several mitigating factors that allow the detectability of this scenario: the expected staining pattern of the intended assay, the use of the same slide and/or internal positive controls, comparison of the label to the run report which will show a protocol mismatch, and interpretation in conjunction with other relevant clinical information and assay results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BENCHMARK ULTRA
Type of Device
SLIDE STAINER, AUTOMATED
Manufacturer (Section D)
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
1910 e innovation park dr
tucson AZ 85755
Manufacturer (Section G)
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
1910 e innovation park dr
na
tucson AZ 85755
Manufacturer Contact
timothy blair
1080 us hwy 202 s
building 500, room: 3530
branchburg, NJ 08876
9253534412
MDR Report Key16767173
MDR Text Key313568064
Report Number2028492-2023-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPA
UDI-Device Identifier04015630981052
UDI-Public04015630981052
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
510K EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number05342716001
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-