• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. FMC BLOODLINE; SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. FMC BLOODLINE; SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN- FMC BLOODLINE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bradycardia (1751); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914)
Event Date 10/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On 25/jan/2023, fresenius was made aware of an article, ¿anaphylaxis from ethylene oxide¿sterilized dialysis tubing and needles: a case report.¿ in the article, there is documentation of a 78-year-old male hemodialysis (hd) patient experiencing an adverse event during treatment utilizing the fresenius combiset tubing.The patient had been completing hd for approximately 2.5 years without significant complications.The patient was previously on peritoneal dialysis.The patient had recently been utilizing a tunneled dialysis catheter (tdc) and transitioned back to use of a right upper extremity arteriovenous fistula (avf).Initial information within the article outlined that this patient experienced hypotension and bradycardia during an hd treatment.The symptoms resolved when treatment was discontinued.The patient was instructed to decrease his anti-hypertensive medications.No further information was provided in the article.Additional information was provided through follow-up with the co-author of the article.The patient was in an hd treatment on (b)(6) 2021.Approximately 15 minutes into a three-hour treatment, the patient¿s oxygen (o2) desaturated to 89% on room air.Additionally, the patient¿s blood pressure (bp) was 96/52 mmhg, heart rate (hr) 53, and respiration rate (rr) 18.The patient was administered medical intervention with 6l o2 via nasal canula (nc) which brought his o2 saturation to 96%.Repeat vitals were taken by the rapid response team (dialysis unit is located within the hospital) with bp 122/68 mmhg, and o2 sat 96% after a reduction to 3l o2.The patient was able to complete the hd treatment.The patient was instructed to reduce his home metoprolol dose from 100mg two times a day (bid) to 50mg bid.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: since the lot number is unknown and the facility number is unknown could not be performed a sap shipping search for the possible involved lots.As a physical evaluation could not be performed, a definitive conclusion regarding the reported incident could not be reached and a cause could not be confirmed.Clinical investigation: based on the available information, there is a temporal and a likely causal relationship between the fresenius combiset tubing and the patient¿s reaction of hypotension and bradycardia requiring the administration of oxygen.Although rare, hypersensitivity or anaphylactoid reactions to dialysis equipment sterilized with ethylene oxide (eto) are a known risk during hemodialysis.The reactions that occur during hd are the result of an immunoallergic response by the patient after exposure to foreign substances present in the extracorporeal circuit.At the time of the event, it was suspected that the patient¿s anti-hypertensive medication could possibly be the cause of the hypotension and bradycardia.However, it was later concluded that the patient¿s resumption of his avf access exposed him to additional products sterilized with eto in the needles (not a fresenius product) used for the hd treatments.The use of the needles in conjunction with the combiset tubing triggered a memory immune response in the patient leading to mast cell degranulation and repeated anaphylactic episodes.This was supported by the consistent timing of the episodes immediately after initiation of hemodialysis with gradual worsening in severity.The immediate and positive response to steroid pe-treatment further supported the theory that these events were allergic in nature.There is no evidence of a fresenius combiset tubing product deficiency or malfunction.Additionally, although the patient experienced an adverse reaction during treatment, there is no allegation of a product malfunction or deficiency related to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FMC BLOODLINE
Type of Device
SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
mike allen #1331
parque industrial reynosa
reynosa 88780
MX  88780
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
director, quality systems
900 w zaragosa drive suite d
pharr TX 78577
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key16786350
MDR Text Key313735873
Report Number0008030665-2023-00381
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FJK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201207
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN- FMC BLOODLINE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-