• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number D-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Problems Difficult to Advance (2920); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 03/07/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Select patient information cannot be included in regulatory report due to regional privacy regulations.Medtronic has requested additional information pertaining to this reportable event.If additional reportable information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, access site hemorrhage was noted.Subsequently, it was reported a procedure was necessary to stop the bleeding.Five days post-implant, the patient was reported to be recovered.Per the physician, the valve and the valve implant procedure contributing factors to the event were unknown.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that during the implant of the valve, the left femoral artery was used for access site.The hemorrhage was observed in the left external iliac artery.The minimum diameter access vessel was 2 millimeter (mm).Per the physician, the hemorrhage occurred during insertion of the valve.A covered stent was implanted to treat the hemorrhage.Per the physician, the patient's stenosis contributed to the event.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Method code additional codes - imf code medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: h6 - results and conclusion codes h10 - conclusion: the subject delivery catheter system (dcs) was discarded by the customer and therefore was unable to be returned for analysis.No procedural images were provided for review.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was noted that the patient had stenosis and the minimum diameter access vessel was 2 millimeter (mm).This indicates that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy.The evolut fx system ifu states ¿patients must present with transarterial access vessels with diameters that are =5.0 mm when using model d-evolutfx-2329¿ this indicates off label use.Advancement difficulties do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.It was reported that, during the procedure, hemorrhage was observed in the left external iliac artery.Vascular complications, such as bleeding, are a known potential adverse patient effect per the evolut fx system instructions for use (ifu), and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/ or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).Per the physician, the hemorrhage occurred during insertion of the valve.Per the physician, the cause of the hemorrhage was "excessive delivery" to the left common iliac artery.Excessive delivery was defined as the physician pushing the dcs forward despite feeling resistance.The evolut fx system ifu cautions the user ¿if there is a significant increase in resistance, stop advancement and investigate the cause of the resistance (for example, magnify the area of resistance) before proceeding.Do not force passage.Forcing passage could increase the risk of vascular complications (for example, vessel dissection or rupture).¿ there is no information to suggest that a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications was related to these events.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that per the physician, the cause of the hemorrhage was "excessive delivery" to the left common iliac artery.Excessive delivery was defined as the physician pushing the delivery catheter system (dcs) forward despite feeling resistance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT FX DCS
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16808022
MDR Text Key313932053
Report Number2025587-2023-01667
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/25/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Catalogue NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Lot Number0011522905
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/21/2023
Date Device Manufactured11/26/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-