It was reported that the procedure was to treat a 90% stenosed lesion in the anterior descending artery with heavy calcification and moderate tortuosity.After pre-dilatation the 2.50x48mm xience xpedition stent delivery system (sds) was advanced to the target lesion and the stent was implanted; however, after several attempts to deflate the balloon of the sds failed to completely deflate.Therefore, excessive force was applied to remove the sds which caused the catheter of the balloon to become stretched and fractured.The sds could not be removed independently and was removed with the guidewire, guide catheter and introducer sheath as a single unit.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay reported in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported shaft stretching and shaft separation were confirmed.The reported difficulty to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was related to operational context of the procedure.The reported deflation problem could not be confirmed due to the condition the device was received for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.It should be noted that the xience xpedition everolimus eluting coronary stent system instruction for use (ifu) states: applying excessive force to the delivery system can potentially result in loss or damage to the stent and/or delivery system components.If it is necessary to retain guide wire position for subsequent artery/lesion access, leave the guide wire in place and remove all other system components.In this case, it is possible that the ifu violation contributed to the reported separation.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported deflation problem; however, factors that may contribute to difficulty deflating the balloon include, but are not limited to, deflation technique, tortuous anatomy, contamination in the inflation lumen or damage to the guide wire and/or inflation lumen.There was no damage or leak noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, which suggests a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported difficulties.In this case, a conclusive cause for the reported deflation issue could not be determined.The reported difficulty to remove and subsequent shaft stretching and shaft separation appear to be related to operational context of the procedure.It should be noted that the force used against the ifu may have contributed to the reported shaft stretching and/or shaft separation; however, give the clinical situation this cannot be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.B5: updated event details h6: medical device problem code 1069 was removed.
|