• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number ONYXNG30012UX
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Embolism/Embolus (4438); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 04/18/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent (des) to treat a severely tortuous, severely calcified lesion with 80% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending (lad) artery.The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during the delivery.It was reported that a stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to/at the lesion.Stent embolization was also reported.The dislodged stent was removed using a snare.The patient is alive with no injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: resistance was not noted during withdrawal of the device.It was confirmed that the stent dislodged during removal when pulling the stent through the left main.There no injury to the patient as a result of the event.Correction: ime code.Additional fdc code added.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was received for analysis.The stent was not present on the balloon upon return.Deformation was evident to the dislodged stent.The balloon folds remained intact.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Image review: images confirm the presence of lesions in the left coronary system.A lesion in what appears to be a ramus vessel was treated successfully with a stent.The procedural wire was difficult to deliver through the severely tortuous lad.The lesion in proximal lad was successfully pre-dilated and attempts to delivery a stent to the vessel was confirmed.The mechanism of stent dislodgement was not provided on the images.But the removal of a dislodged stent through the peripheral vessels with a snare can be confirmed from the images.This stent appeared to be damaged i.E., flared on the distal end of the stent.Procedural wires were removed from the left coronary system.Re-introduction of the procedural wire appeared to be difficult due to the vessel tortuosity.The pre-dilation balloon was delivered with the support of a guide extension catheter (gec).A stent can be seen exiting the tip of the guide catheter (gc) that was removed without deployment.This was followed with the delivery and deployment of a shorter stent in the lad proximal lesion.Then a further short stent was delivered and successfully deployed distal to the newly deployed proximal stent in the lad.The vessel patency was resolved with deployment of two shorter stents.It appears most likely that the severe vessel tortuosity contri buted to the delivery and dislodgement issues.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONYX FRONTIER
Type of Device
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16821798
MDR Text Key314075044
Report Number9612164-2023-01793
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
UDI-Device Identifier00763000511463
UDI-Public00763000511463
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/27/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberONYXNG30012UX
Device Catalogue NumberONYXNG30012UX
Device Lot Number0011591331
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/16/2023
Date Device Manufactured01/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight45 KG
-
-