Model Number ONYXNG30012UX |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problems
Embolism/Embolus (4438); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 04/18/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent (des) to treat a severely tortuous, severely calcified lesion with 80% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending (lad) artery.The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during the delivery.It was reported that a stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to/at the lesion.Stent embolization was also reported.The dislodged stent was removed using a snare.The patient is alive with no injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: resistance was not noted during withdrawal of the device.It was confirmed that the stent dislodged during removal when pulling the stent through the left main.There no injury to the patient as a result of the event.Correction: ime code.Additional fdc code added.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the device was received for analysis.The stent was not present on the balloon upon return.Deformation was evident to the dislodged stent.The balloon folds remained intact.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Image review: images confirm the presence of lesions in the left coronary system.A lesion in what appears to be a ramus vessel was treated successfully with a stent.The procedural wire was difficult to deliver through the severely tortuous lad.The lesion in proximal lad was successfully pre-dilated and attempts to delivery a stent to the vessel was confirmed.The mechanism of stent dislodgement was not provided on the images.But the removal of a dislodged stent through the peripheral vessels with a snare can be confirmed from the images.This stent appeared to be damaged i.E., flared on the distal end of the stent.Procedural wires were removed from the left coronary system.Re-introduction of the procedural wire appeared to be difficult due to the vessel tortuosity.The pre-dilation balloon was delivered with the support of a guide extension catheter (gec).A stent can be seen exiting the tip of the guide catheter (gc) that was removed without deployment.This was followed with the delivery and deployment of a shorter stent in the lad proximal lesion.Then a further short stent was delivered and successfully deployed distal to the newly deployed proximal stent in the lad.The vessel patency was resolved with deployment of two shorter stents.It appears most likely that the severe vessel tortuosity contri buted to the delivery and dislodgement issues.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|