SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. ATELLICA IM TOTAL HCG (THCG); VISUAL, PREGNANCY HCG, PRESCRIPTION USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
High Test Results (2457)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/22/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A customer from outside of the u.S.Reported observation of an elevated atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing.An initial result conflicted with lower results produced two days later, using both a new sample and replicate testing of the original sample.The instructions for use (ifu) states the following, under interpretation of results: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." siemens is investigating.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reports observation of an elevated atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing.The discordant elevated result was observed for an 18-year-old female patient.An initial result conflicted with lower results produced two days later, using both a new sample and replicate testing of the original sample.The initial, discordant result was reported to the physician; the result was not questioned by the physician.There are no allegations of patient harm, changes in treatment, or delays of diagnosis in association with the observed result discordance.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Mdr 2432235-2023-00086 was initially submitted on 2023-04-27.Update, 2023 (b)(6): siemens has concluded the investigation.A customer from outside the united states reported observation of an elevated atellica im total hcg (thcg) result for one patient which was discordant relative to repeat testing, using both the original and a new sample.Reagent issues are not indicated as results for external quality control (qc) samples were within expected ranges, and no problems were observed with results for other samples.Instrument performance was assessed, and review of instrument trace files determined that sample and reagent processing met specification, and that there were no signs of issues with aspiration or dispense.Based on the available information, the cause of the discordant result is consistent with preanalytical and/or sample-handling issues.A product problem was not identified.The customer is operational.Note: in section h6, the codes for investigation findings and investigation conclusion have been updated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|