Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Ulcer (2274); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Mdr2054 201-027 ae2.Stent migration.80 days post placement stent migration distally - stent removed endoscopically - ryles inserted.Patient outcome: resolved; treatment endoscopic - study stent removed, medical ryles inserted; death yes.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow-up mdr report will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
|
Event Description
|
This correction follow-up report is being submitted due to below updates made to the complaint record on 05-may-2023: 1.User error identified as physician/assistant performed alternative treatment method post placement of stent - chemotherapy treatment after stent placement.2.Section 10.Medical device problem code (annex a) changed from a24 - adverse event without identified device or use problem to a2303 - improper or incorrect procedure or method.3.Section 10.Component code (annex g) changed from g04122 - stent to g07001 - part/component/sub-assembly term not applicable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow-up mdr report will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is a supplemental report due to the completion of the investigation on the 03-aug-2023.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
User/use related complaints are considered foreseen misuse.It is unknown how the device will perform outside of instructions for use and/or labelling requirements.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.Trending will monitor if any future investigation is required.Device evaluation.The device evaluation for evolution® esophageal controlled-release stent -fully covered could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records.Prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.Manufacturing records review could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.Instructions for use and/label.The instructions for use, ifu0061 which accompanies this device, states ¿after stent placement, alternative methods of treatment such as chemotherapy and tumour shrinkage should not be administered this may increase risk of stent migration due to tumour shrinkage, stent erosion, and/or mucosal bleeding.¿¿ there is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review.An image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis.Definitive root cause was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.It is known from the available information that the patient received chemotherapy after stent placement.As per instructions for use after stent placement, alternative methods of treatment such as chemotherapy and tumour shrinkage should not be administered this may increase risk of stent migration due to tumour shrinkage, stent erosion, and/or mucosal bleeding.It is likely that the follow up chemotherapy resulted in the stent migration.The patient death was unrelated to the study device.Confirmation of complaint.Complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Corrective action/ correction.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.Summary of investigation.According to the pmcf study the patient received chemotherapy post stent placement and 80 days post stent placement the stent migrated distally.Confirmed quantity of 1 device, confirmed used.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The migrated stent was removed endoscopically.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.
|
|
Event Description
|
Supplemental correction report being submitted due to us decision tree is only for malfunction but should be serious injury based on the migration and the f code applied.Section b1 " adverse event and/or product problem" left blank in complete #2 mdr report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Supplemental correction report being submitted due to us decision tree is only for malfunction but should be serious injury based on the migration and the f code applied.Section b1 " adverse event and/or product problem" left blank in complete #2 mdr report.User/use related complaints are considered foreseen misuse.It is unknown how the device will perform outside of instructions for use and/or labelling requirements.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.Trending will monitor if any future investigation is required.Device evaluation the device evaluation for evolution® esophageal controlled-release stent -fully covered could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.Manufacturing records review could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.Instructions for use and/label the instructions for use, ifu0061 which accompanies this device, states ¿after stent placement, alternative methods of treatment such as chemotherapy and tumour shrinkage should not be administered this may increase risk of stent migration due to tumour shrinkage, stent erosion, and/or mucosal bleeding.¿¿ there is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis definitive root cause was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.It is known from the available information that the patient received chemotherapy after stent placement.As per instructions for use after stent placement, alternative methods of treatment such as chemotherapy and tumour shrinkage should not be administered this may increase risk of stent migration due to tumour shrinkage, stent erosion, and/or mucosal bleeding.It is likely that the follow up chemotherapy resulted in the stent migration.The patient death was unrelated to the study device.Confirmation of complaint complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Corrective action/ correction complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.Summary of investigation according to the pmcf study the patient received chemotherapy post stent placement and 80 days post stent placement the stent migrated distally.Confirmed quantity of 1 device, confirmed used.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The migrated stent was removed endoscopically.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|