A nurse reported a codman perforator (b)(6) was fixed/stuck in the cranium during a craniotomy on (b)(6) 2023.They were unable to removed the burr completely and had to do a full craniotomy around it, causing a bruised brain post-op, but otherwise doing fine.A 30-minute surgical delay was reported.The patient was doing fine.The manufacturer of the drill used with the perforator was a pneumatic medtronic drill-midas rex, and the perforator clicked in place in the drill.
|
The disposable perforator (id 261221) was returned for evaluation.Device history record (dhr) - there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis: a visual inspection utilizing the unaided eye was performed, the unit was received disassembled and was heavily soiled with organic matter.A spring test was attempted, since the unit was received disassembled the device could not be tested "as is".Upon re-assembly of the unit it was noticed that the outer drill was deformed and the inner drill could no longer slide easily into the out drill.The opening of the outer drill was measured with a pin gauge and it was determined that it did not meet manufacturing specifications.The unit was forcefully reassembled and re-sleeved to determine how the unit would drill, once re-sleeved the unit still did not pass the spring test as the deformed outer drill impeded functionality.Functional test performed, unit successfully drilled 5 holes but the perforator was vibrating and was very loud.Complaint could not be verified to be due to manufacturing error.This is highly unlikely to have happened during the manufacturing process as the unit would not have been able to be initially assembled and would have been flagged by the operators.Additionally, the are 2 other inspection points further down the manufacturing process where this defect would have been caught as well.It is likely that the damage to the outer drill occurred during surgery.Although the drill did not pass manufacturing specifications upon return to the investigation facility the complaint condition could not be confirmed due to the damage to the drill occurring during surgery and not a result of its manufacturing.Root cause- the root cause remains undetermined.A dhr review and trending were performed as part of the investigation.Product was received for analysis and the investigation could not confirm the complaint condition.Possible root cause per the failure analyst ¿excessive drill rpm and/or force does not allow proper cut.Drill becomes ¿screwed¿ into skull¿.
|