Block b3 date of event: the exact event onset date is unknown.The provided event date of (b)(6) 2008 was chosen as a best estimate based on the date of the mesh was implanted.Blocks d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implanting physician is: (b)(6).Block h6: the following imdrf patient code captures the reportable event of: e2401 - unspecified personal injury.The following imdrf impact code captures the reportable event of: f12 - patient had filed a legal claim for injuries related to the device.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that the polyform synthetic mesh device was implanted into the patient during an anterior repair with mesh augmentation, sacrospinous suspension, and suburethral sling for incontinence during a transobturator approach procedure on (b)(6) 2008, for the treatment of grade-3 cystocele, uterine descent, vaginal prolapse, and incontinence.Panendoscopy of the bladder revealed no intravesical lesions.There was no bladder injury following the passage of the sling needles and/or repair.Notably, there was calcified structure going along the arcuate line on palpation of the right side.The surgeon is unsure if this is a calcified vessel because there was no pulsation on it.During their suspension repair, he kept a safe distance from this structure.Despite this, the patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged in good condition with a foley catheter in place.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient has experienced an unspecified injury as a result of the surgery.
|