• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 S; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 S; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 200 S
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Fever (1858); Internal Organ Perforation (1987)
Event Date 03/30/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved esu was inspected/tested.The unit was found to be functioning as intended.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Based upon the provided information, the report of the patient complaining of pain during the procedure was most likely the result of low frequency currents.This is a known phenomenon in electrosurgery and occurs mostly with non-contact modalities or modes like endocut where there are alternating cutting and coagulation phases.A perforation is a rare but serious complication of a diagnostic ercp.A thermal injury (e.G., from hf-current) and/or mechanical injury (e.G., from the accessory) cannot be excluded as potential factors in the incident.However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the event.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this incident.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during and after an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp).The esu was used with a cook sphincterotome (g34779) and a 3m neutral electrode.The neutral electrode was placed on the patient's right thigh.The esu mode endocut i was used.During the procedure, the patient experienced pain.The following day, the patient came back to the hospital with pain and a fever.A perforation was detected and surgery was performed to address the issue.The patient was then in the hospital for seven (7) days to recover.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 200 S
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key16910389
MDR Text Key314983176
Report Number9610614-2023-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K080715
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 200 S
Device Catalogue Number10140-400
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/18/2023
Date Manufacturer Received05/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/17/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-