Please note the corrections made to the h6 device code and the clinical signs code: the reported event was confirmed, since evaluation of the provided imaging does indicate the likely need for a revision surgery.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed, some of the problems are likely to be user related, as impingement might be caused by the selection of the talar components size.There is not too much to see with regards to loosening for the tibia, which is in line with the surgeons statement.The talar component does not show clear signs of loosening or migration, however there are conflicts visible specifically with the medial malleolus of the tibia.That seems to be the reason for the revision.No clear signs of loosening, migration, infection or breakage.Some conflict of the talar component with the surrounding tissue." based on the investigation, the root cause can be attributed to a combination of the patient and user related issue.There are conflicts visible with the medial malleoulus and tibia that could be the result of the talar size selected in the primary surgery.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|