EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 11500A |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Malposition of Device (2616)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/30/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry (ipr).This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.It was reported via the implant patient registry that this valve model 11500a27 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of four (4) days due to dehiscence leading to paravalvular leakage.As per the surgeon, prosthesis was not properly attached to the aortic annulus.The event was observed on echo on post-operative day 2.As per the echo report provided, there was moderate aortic insufficiency and the main jet was eccentric anterior and suspected of periprosthetic leakage.Average transprosthetic gradient was 7 mmhg.Another edwards valve of the same model and size was implanted in replacement.As reported, patient was discharged home without any complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned for evaluation, as customer confirmed it was not available.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry (ipr).This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.It was reported via the implant patient registry that this valve model 11500a27 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of four (4) days due to paravalvular leakage secondary to malposition of the device.As per surgeon's opinion, the valve was not well seated on the annulus at the time of implant.The event was observed on echo on post-operative day 2.As per the echo report provided, there was moderate anterior periprosthetic leakage and mild intraprosthetic aortic insufficiency.Average transprosthetic gradient was 7 mmhg.Another edwards valve of the same model and size was implanted in replacement.As reported, patient was discharged home without any complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10 manufacturer narrative: the device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.The reported paravalvular leak was likely caused by the malposition of the device.Based on the information available, the most likely cause is patient factors, including the thickening of the annulus mentioned in the eco report provided.An edwards defect has not been confirmed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|