• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED2-350-14
Device Problems Break (1069); Unintended Ejection (1234)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/08/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received a report that the pipeline prematurely opened.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of an unruptured aneurysm in the paraophthalmic.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was normal.Dual antiplatelet treatment was administered.The pru level is unknown.The angiographic result post procedure was successful.It was reported that the physician deployed pipeline in the ica.The  dr.Did not think his initial deployment was aligned correctly and went to resheath the device into the phenom 27 in accordance to the ifu.However, during this process, it appeared as if the device fell off of the resheathing pad.The physician felt as if the safest approach was to remove the phenom 27 with the device partially captured and to complete the case with a new phenom 27 as well as a new pipeline shield of the same size.Deployment was a technical success and the patient is doing well.The pipeline was not used for an indication that is off-label.The pipeline device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.Ancillary devices include a q-apel medical guide catheter (fg220927e-02 sf7072-095-27-30 )/ 95 cm select flex ii 072 armadillo, and aristotle 24 soft guidewire (ga3501 lot#220916) .Additional information received that it was clarified that the pipeline prematurely detached inside the phenom 27.The pipeline separated from the pushwire.The pushwire was not rotated or pulled back at anytime during the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis: #(b)(6) equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), ruler (m-83361), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5), in-house 0.0260in mandrel, document used: dwgsfg15xxx-yyyy-zz rev.F, as found condition: the pipeline flex shield was returned stuck inside the phenom 27 catheter; within the outer carton; inside of a sealed bio-hazard bag and a shipping box., damage location details: the distal and proximal dps restraints were found to be intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The pushwire appeared to be separated at proximal to the dps sleeves.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched with the ptfe shrink tubing still intact.The distal and proximal ends of the braid were found fully opened and frayed.No bend was observed on the pushwire.No defects were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker, re-sheathing pad or with the proximal bumper.The catheter tip and marker were examined; no damages were found.The catheter body was found to be accordion at 4.6cm to 13.4cm from the distal tip.The broken end sent out for sem analysis.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis: the pipeline flex shield could not be pushed forward or removed.The catheter was cut to remove the pipeline flex shield.The catheter total and usable length were measured within specifications.The catheter was flushed with water and found patent.The catheter was then tested by running an in-house 0.0260¿ mandrel through catheter tip and hub.The mandrel successfully passed through the catheter hub with no issues; however, resistance was observed at the damaged locations.Per sem results: the broken end failed via ductile overload.Conclusion: based on the returned devices, the customer complaint was confirmed as the returned pipeline flex shield was stuck inside the phenom 27 catheter.In addition, the pushwire separated at proximal to the dps sleeves.Per the sem results, the broken end failed via ductile overload.Additionally, from the damages seen on the catheter (accordioning), braid (fraying), pushwire (separating), and hypotube (stretching); it appears there was high force used.It is possibly these damages occurred when the customer attempted to advance/resheath the pipeline flex shield through the catheter against resistance.However, the cause of resistance could not be determined.Possible cause of resistance includes lack of continuous flush during delivery.Ls 2023-07-06.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key16930444
MDR Text Key315308226
Report Number2029214-2023-00793
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000284152
UDI-Public00763000284152
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/15/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPED2-350-14
Device Catalogue NumberPED2-350-14
Device Lot NumberB321117
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/11/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age31 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-