• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ PID; GRAM POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION PANEL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ PID; GRAM POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION PANEL Back to Search Results
Model Number 448008
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/18/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
E.6 initial reporter e-mail: (b)(6).E.7 initial reporter addr 1: (b)(6).H.3.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ pid that there was misidentification.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the percentage of misidentification is increasing with this batch.It is mainly strains of staphylococcus aureus that are identified as another staphylococcal species or the opposite.Did the failure occur with control or patient samples? patients sample and controls.What confirmatory tests were performed to determine that the results were in error? yes because the identification results were not consistent with the appearance of the colonies on the cultures and pre-diagnostic tests.Were any wrong results reported to the doctors? no.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ pid that there was misidentification.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the percentage of misidentification is increasing with this batch.It is mainly strains of staphylococcus aureus that are identified as another staphylococcal species or the opposite.Did the failure occur with control or patient samples? patients sample and controls what confirmatory tests were performed to determine that the results were in error? yes because the identification results were not consistent with the appearance of the colonies on the cultures and pre-diagnostic tests.Were any wrong results reported to the doctors? no.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary: this complaint is not confirmed.This complaint is for misidentification of staphylococcus aureus as staphylococcus warneri when using phoenix panel pid (448008) batch number 2152720.The customer did not provide panel returns or isolate returns but provided lab reports for the investigation.The lab reports show an organism identified as s.Warneri when using the complaint batch.To investigate, three (3) retention panels from complaint batch 2152720 were tested using qc isolates of s.Aureus a29213 on a phoenix m50 instrument and evaluated for identification results.Additionally, three (3) retention panels from complaint batch 2152720 were tested using qc isolates of s.Aureus a43300 on a phoenix m50 instrument and evaluated for identification results.All six (6) panels identified as s.Aureus, therefore, this complaint is not confirmed.A review of quality notifications revealed no quality notifications generated on the complaint batch.A review of complaints revealed no additional complaints on this complaint batch.Complaint trending was performed, and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd id/ast plant quality will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.Please continue to communicate any additional concerns.Bd encourages you to consider the following parameters to optimize results within your laboratory.Qc testing should only be performed on 2nd pass subcultures and avoid using colonies that have been sub-cultured multiple times.Isolated colonies are to be used for inoculation and carefully check purity plates to ensure the inoculum consisted of one isolate type.Optimum performance comes from using fresh 18-24 hour, well-isolated colonies.Ensure proper, sufficient inoculum density.Allow bubbles to dissipate after vortexing.Properly calibrate the bd phoenixspec¿ nephelometer with in-date mcfarland calibration standards.Use swabs with minimal fiber shed.Make the proper inoculum density for the inoculum system setting (i.E., if preparing a 0.25 mcfarland inoculum, ensure that the system is set to 0.5 inoculum mode).Volume of id broth should be visually assessed for any obvious low fills ensure proper incubation temperature and environment.Use the correct media type as listed as acceptable for use in the user¿s manual (note - it is helpful to disclose the media type and vendor when providing the details of the complaint).Handle panels by only touching the sides; touching the front or back of the panels may cause interference in the readings and lead to errors follow user¿s manual instructions for time limits on pouring inoculated id broth into the panel and placing the panel into the instrument; extended periods of time outside of the stated limitations may yield errors.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ PID
Type of Device
GRAM POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION PANEL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
5859 farinon drive
san antonio, TX 78249
8448235433
MDR Report Key16939061
MDR Text Key315303265
Report Number1119779-2023-00558
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQL
UDI-Device Identifier30382904480081
UDI-Public30382904480081
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date06/30/2023
Device Model Number448008
Device Catalogue Number448008
Device Lot Number2152720
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-