• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. THUNDERBEAT 5 MM, 35 CM, FRONT-ACTUATED GRIP; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. THUNDERBEAT 5 MM, 35 CM, FRONT-ACTUATED GRIP; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number TB-0535FC
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pneumonia (2011); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Date 03/27/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "comparison of short-term surgical outcomes of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic systems in laparoscopic cholecystectomy." the purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the 3d endoscopic system (3d) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lc).87 patients with lc were included in the study, divided into 2d and 3d groups.The breakdown was as follows: 44 patients in the 2d group and 44 patients in the 3d group.The 3d group had significantly more patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery than the 2d group.Intraoperative blood loss was 1.6±2.3 ml in the 2d group and 8.1±363 ml in the 3d group (p=0.004), showing a significant increase in the 3d group, but no difference in operation time or postoperative hospital stay.However, there was no difference in operative time or postoperative hospital stay.There was no difference in the background of patients with acute cholecystitis (10 patients in the 2d group and 26 patients in the 3d group) between the two groups, but there was no difference in operative time or postoperative hospital days.There were no differences between the two groups in acute cholecystitis in the 2d group (10 patients) and the 3d group (26 patients), but there were 5 patients in the 3d group who had undergone previous upper abdominal surgery.There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups.There were no differences in surgical outcomes between the two groups.The present study did not demonstrate the usefulness of the 3d endoscopy system for lc.In order to investigate the usefulness of the 3d endoscopy system for lc in the future, the patients should be randomly assigned to the 3d group and the 2d group, and a forward-looking comparative study should be continued.In order to investigate the usefulness of the 3d endoscopic system for lc in the future, it is necessary to continue the comparative study and accumulate more cases.Type of adverse events/number of patients: wound infection 3 patients.Pneumonia 4 patients.Pancreatitis 1 patient.This literature article requires 2 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: (b)(6) : t3905.(b)(6): tb-0535fc.This medwatch report is for patient identifier (b)(6).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the literature described "thunderbeat", olympus selected "tb-tb-0535fc" which was shipped the most in the area and in the study period as a representative product.The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event Description
The author confirmed there were no olympus device malfunction during any procedure described in this literature and the author doesn't think olympus device cause or contribute to any of the patient adverse events(include death) described in this literature.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation and to provide additional information received from the author.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THUNDERBEAT 5 MM, 35 CM, FRONT-ACTUATED GRIP
Type of Device
ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16950928
MDR Text Key315441589
Report Number9614641-2023-00688
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier04953170337574
UDI-Public04953170337574
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K111202
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/17/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTB-0535FC
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-